Indigenous Australians

Bill Shorten calls for Commonwealth to compensate Stolen Generations

Earlier today, Bill Shorten suggested the Commonwealth provide compensation for victims of the Stolen Generation.

Now, as I’ve detailed before, the idea of the Stolen Generations: that white Australians historically ‘stole’ half- caste children away from Indigenous mothers to diminish the Aboriginal race, is totally fictitious.

But even if this did occur, and that we can equally compare 1930’s Australia to Hitler’s Germany, then what is the issue with Shorten’s proposal?

First, it is ridiculous to assign the federal government healing duties for actions that states were allegedly responsible for. As prior to the 1967 referendum on Aboriginal rights, the federal government had negligible influence in Indigenous affairs. So while the supposed Stolen Generations was at its peak between 1920- 1967, state jurisdictions dealt with their Indigenous people in differing ways.

Given this, Shorten’s view of Indigenous people as a single monolith, and his assuming that similar treatment was prescribed to all Aboriginals in the past, is incredibly foolish.

Pretending that Indigenous people maintain a monopoly over unfair treatment is also misleading. Irish, Chinese, Italian, Greek and Vietnamese people were all treated harshly at different points. And if we are going to list every group that had atrocities committed against them, we can be sure that the convicts didn’t receive royal treatment either. Likewise, once upon a time, single mothers could be forced by the church to give up their children. All kinds of different injustices have occurred, committed by institutions such as the police, the government, and many others.

So what is the sense in reserving a unique status for Aboriginal people?

However, a far bigger problem than past legal technicalities, in addition to recognition of other forms of unfairness, lies at heart.

After years of apologies, virtue- signalling and nation- wide imposed shame, I am still yet to hear Shorten, or any other regressive politician, state at which point our country can finally be allowed to heal its sins of the past.

At what time can we move forward into a multi- ethnic, cohesive Australia with hopeful minds for the future, and become unburdened by our past?

Personally, I suspect that Shorten doesn’t believe in the merit of what he is saying, rather, his language is mere red meat to throw out for the severely regressive parts of his party.

It was this exact Leftist, overly self- critical viewpoint which saw Kevin Rudd formally apologize for the Stolen Generations 9 years ago.

At the time, I was young and everyone appeared to be overjoyed by the news of Rudd’s apology.

So I went along with the rest of the crowd, applauded Kevin Rudd for his apology, and genuinely believed that Australia was set for a more united, positive future.

However, circumstances have since been contrary to this prediction, whilst problems for Indigenous people have only worsened.

If history is anything for a guide, promoting the existence of a permanent grievance- industry for Indigenous Australians, has done nothing but harm their outlook.

Shorten would do well to move past supporting headline- grabbing rhetoric, and instead move toward developing policies, which genuinely assist Indigenous Australians out of their terrible present mess..

7 thoughts on “Bill Shorten calls for Commonwealth to compensate Stolen Generations

  1. There are two works that definitively show these claims of yours to be untrue, Margaret Jacobs, White Mother to a Dark Race: Settler Colonialism, Maternalism, and the Removal of Indigenous Children in the American West and Australia, 1880-1940 (University of Nebraska Press, 2009), which won Columbia University’s The Bancroft Prize in History, one of the most prestigious prizes in the world historical profession; and also her other book A Generation Removed: The Fostering and Adoption of Indigenous Children in the Postwar World (University of Nebraska Press, 2014). The percentage of indigenous children removed from their homes ranged between 25% to 35% between 1950 and 1978, when at least in the US, the Indian Child Welfare Act was passed by the Congress.


    1. Well I encourage you to read my previous posts about this. But, I certainly understand that my view is in the minority (in regards to whether or not the stolen generations occurred). But couldn’t we at least seek common ground on how to move forward to the future, as isn’t this more important?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s